Pep Guardiola Plans Talk with Erling Haaland After Leeds Win
Manchester City defeated Leeds 3-2, but Erling Haaland failed to score and had a brief post-match exchange with Pep Guardiola. The coach later said the discussion was about getting Haaland more involved since he did not receive enough service.
Manchester City defeated Leeds 3-2, but Erling Haaland failed to score and had a brief post-match exchange with Pep Guardiola. The coach later said the discussion was about getting Haaland more involved since he did not receive enough service. Guardiola praised his effort but added that the striker may need rest and a conversation soon.
Doing the review of Manchester City’s latest Premier League outing against Leeds, the focus quickly shifted from their 3-2 win to the animated post-match exchange between Pep Guardiola and Erling Haaland. The Norwegian striker did not find the net in the match, and cameras captured Guardiola speaking intensely to him at full-time. While the moment sparked debate, the City manager clarified in his interview with Sky Sports that there was no conflict.
Instead, he highlighted the team’s ongoing challenge of involving Haaland more consistently in open play. Guardiola admitted that City sometimes struggle to connect with their main striker, insisting that Haaland needs more service to influence games the way he is capable of. The manager also added that the forward has been playing continuously without much rest, hinting that managing his workload could be crucial in the coming weeks.
Guardiola explained that his discussion with Haaland was about improving coordination and ensuring the striker receives the ball in dangerous areas. He expressed satisfaction with Haaland’s overall performance but stressed the need for tactical adjustments. The exchange was not a confrontation but a reminder of the high standards expected at Manchester City as they push deeper into the season across multiple competitions.
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comments
Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions
0 Comments